The Rhode Island Supreme Court has held an attorney is entitled to collect a contingency fee under a contract with his client when he has “substantially performed” his duties and only “minor and relatively unimportant” matters remain at the time the client discharges the attorney. Otherwise, the attorney’s recovery is determined by quantum meruit. The Law Office of Thomas A. Tarro, III v. Checralla, No. 2011-123-Appeal, (R.I. Feb. 21, 2013).
Attorney’s fees under contingency fee agreement
| Feb 24, 2013 | Firm News
- Employers must be careful to avoid pregnancy discrimination November 13, 2020
- 5 common signs of workplace discrimination August 15, 2020
- Non-Retained Experts in Federal Court July 21, 2020
- What should you do if a debt collector sues you? June 3, 2020
- The 3 types of late paying customers May 21, 2020